dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study was: to experiment the activity using the (P) SPC2PAS
model for Business Administration Undergraduates in Rajamangala university of Technology Phra Nakhon in (1) a comparison of achievement test of post-scores with pre-test scores of the first phase; (2) a comparison of post-test scores with pre-test scores of the second phase; (3) the result of the activity’s self-reflection of knowledge, attitude, and performance of learners; and (4) learners’ attitude towards an (P) SPC 2 PAS model. The research procedure was comprised of two phases. In Phase 1, there was the adjusted (P) SPC2PAS Model which was applied to use with Business Administration Undergraduates in Business Finance at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. In Phase 2, there was the experimentation of (P) SPC2PAS Model with Business Administration Undergraduates in Business Finance at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The experimental group was the forty first-year financial undergraduates, in the 2nd
Semester of Academic Year 2010. The research instruments were: the business finance achievement test, the self-reflective learning checklist, and the attitude questionnaire, analyzed by percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the t-test.
The result of the study showed that: (1) the mean scores of the sample group in the first phase of business finance comprehension’s post-test was significantly higher than of the pre-test at the statistical level of 0.05; (2) the mean scores of the sample group in the second phase of business finance comprehension’s post-test was significantly higher than of the pre-test at the statistical level of 0.05; (3) The learners’ spiral-learning development of the all activities’ self-reflection of knowledge, attitude, and performance of learners, was 100 percentage; and (4) learners’ attitude towards using (P) SPC2PAS Model of Business Finance for Business Administration Undergraduates at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon in the areas of the activity model, teacher’s role, instrument, and learning evaluation was in mean scores at good to very good level-positive attitude. | en_US |