Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTunprawat, Chanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSrijantuek, Kiattipongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnamwettayanon, Chukiaten_US
dc.contributor.authorKamonnarakit, Santien_US
dc.contributor.authorThongsri, Kornpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorชานนท์ ตันประวัติ
dc.contributor.authorเกียรติพงษ์ ศรีจันทึก
dc.contributor.authorชูเกียรติ อนันต์เวทยานนท์
dc.contributor.authorสันติ กมลนรากิจ
dc.contributor.authorกรณ์พงศ์ ทองศรี
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-21T08:14:45Z
dc.date.available2016-04-21T08:14:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.rmutp.ac.th/handle/123456789/1923
dc.descriptionรายงานวิจัย -- มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนคร, 2554en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research aims to study and test a ceramic product in using to constructs a wall. This research is based on a previous studying to develop a ceramic product that saves the energy in the building. The early test shows the product has out door heat resisting capability and it is very user-friendly. However, the test was only an early stage. The research still lack of a real life situation test and has very little feedback from the consumers. All of which are very importance to farther develop this product into a production stage. The research has 2 steps. First step, to testing the heat and humidity resisting quality of the product, the researcher is building four testing blocks (dimension 1x1x1 meter). Each block has different material on one of its side, block 1 has brick, block 2 has concrete masonry unit, block 3 has autoclaved aerated concrete, and block 4 has ceramic block. The other three side of each block have a heated and humidity resisting form. The researches test the following; heat energy, the temperature inside the blocks, and humidity inside the block. After comparing the difference between the airs inside and out-side of the blocks, the block 2 with concrete masonry unit has the best humidity resisting quality and is the most user-friendly product. In the term of heat resisting, block 3 with autoclaved aerated concrete perform the best. Second step, to test the user-friendliness of the product, the researcher found 2 groups of consumers. First group are the wall constructing expert. This group has a hard time using this product and can’t get use d to the product so, they find this product to be too thin and too weak. Second group the home owner, feel the product has a thinner wall and believe it’s weaker than a typical construction brick. There for, they still don’t know how to use this product.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRajamangala University of Technology Phra NaKhonen_US
dc.language.isothen_US
dc.publisherRajamangala University of Technology Phra NaKhonen_US
dc.subjectCeramicsen_US
dc.subjectConservation Buildingen_US
dc.subjectWall of Energyen_US
dc.titleTesting the ceramics using for making the wall of energy conservation buildingen_US
dc.title.alternativeโครงการออกแบบและพัฒนาผลิตภัณฑ์เซรามิกส์ที่ใช้ในการก่อผนักเพื่อการอนุรักษ์การใช้พลังงานภายในอาคารen_US
dc.typeResearch Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record