Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoonme, Polruten_US
dc.contributor.authorพลรัชต์ บุญมีen_US
dc.contributor.authorLakkam, Supachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorศุภชัย หลักคาen_US
dc.contributor.authorChotswasd, Phusiten_US
dc.contributor.authorภูษิต โชติสวัสดิ์en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-28T05:36:35Z
dc.date.available2016-09-28T05:36:35Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-28
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.rmutp.ac.th/handle/123456789/2073
dc.descriptionรายงานวิจัย -- มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนคร, 2558en_US
dc.description.abstractPresently, the rail transit system plays a major role in the commercial world that they currently use diesel engine not only causing to a lot of fuel consumption but also generating numerously pollution. Therefore, this project aims to study the break-even point of investment under comparison of brake specific fuel consumption and pollution of locomotive engines. By experimental works, there are 3 types of locomotive engine: Pielstick, M.T.U. and Caterpillar, which are the difference of the combustion chamber and the fuel injection systems. The simulation load on the static tests (Dynamometer) was used following the regulation characteristic curve which is standard of State Railway of Thailand. As a result of testing, the engine using common rail type of fuel injection system, M.T.U., was the lowest brake specific fuel consumption at all of engine by the average of all engine speed 206 g/kW-h of brake specific fuel consumption. It is lower than Caterpillar (Semi common rail with direct injection) which is 314 g/kW-h equivalent 34.39 % while Pielstick engine, a mechanism fuel injection system, is 389 g/kW-h equivalent 47.04 % For pollution area, there are Hydrocarbon (HC), Nitrogen Oxide (NOX), and black smut. The engine with direct injection system relieved the previous substance less than the pre-combustion engine. Moreover, the compound of carbon monoxide (CO) was found that the pre-combustion engine (Pielstick) discharged carbon monoxide (CO) less than the direct injection engine (Caterpillar) whereas the common rail engine emancipated same substan cenear by with the pre-combustion engine (Pielstick). However, the new technology of the engines is high maintenance costs. Therefore, a number of applications have to be needed to make a quantitative value for the investment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhonen_US
dc.language.isothen_US
dc.subjectDiesel Engineen_US
dc.subjectเครื่องยนต์ดีเซลen_US
dc.subjectRail transporten_US
dc.subjectการขนส่งทางรถไฟen_US
dc.titleA study of reduction of pollution and fuel consumption for locomotive engine optimizing to investmenten_US
dc.title.alternativeการศึกษาเทคโนโลยีที่เหมาะสมกับการลดมลพิษและอัตราการสิ้นเปลืองเชื้อเพลิงของหัวรถจักร เพื่อความคุ้มค่าต่อการลงทุนen_US
dc.typeResearch Reporten_US
dc.contributor.emailauthorarit@rmutp.ac.then_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record