Tuiles supplementaly with wolffia dry

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the three basic tuiles recipes and to study the content of four types of wolffia dry in tuiles at 0% , 2% , 4% and6% of total ingredient weight. By planning randomized complete block design(RCBD) and evaluating sensory quality in appearance, color, odor, taste, texture (crispy), and overall preference with the use of testing methods for 9- Point Hedonic Scale. The study the basic formula for tuiles by allowing 40 tasters and the study this tuiles supplementaly with wolffia dry by allowing 80 testers to be undergraduates in food and nutrition, Faculty of Home Economics Tecnology Rajamangkala University of Tecnology Phranakhon. Take average data(Mean), analyze variance (Analysis of Variance, ANOVA) and compare differances mean values (Duncan’s New Multiple Test, DMRT) The results of the 3 basic formulas of tuiles, namely found that the tasting person accepted the formula 1 in appearance, color, taste, texture (crispy), and overall preference. Average 8.02 7.95 8.08 7.93 and 8.13 respectively at the level medium to high level and the tasting person accepted the formula 3 in odor preference average of 7.70 at the level medium. When analyzed Variance and comparison of differences found that appearance, color, odor, taste, texture (crispy), and overall preference there are significant differences at the level of 0.05. The results of the study of the amount of tuiles supplementaly with wolffian dry in 4 formula found that the tasting person accepted the formula supplementaly 2% in color, odor, texture ( crispy) , and overall preference average of 8. 15 7. 79 8. 28 and 8. 05 respectively at the level medium to high level and tasting person accepted the replace 0% in appearance and taste preference average of 8. 18 and 7. 88 at the level medium to high level. When analyzed variance and comparison of statistical differences found that appearance, color, odor, taste, texture ( crispy) , and overall preference there are significant difference at the level of 0.05.